Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2019-09-15
Abstract Views: 70
Views PDF: 24
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53747/jnst.v9i3.45
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 3 (2019)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
L. X., C., P.-A., S., A., C., P., D., A., G., P. D., K., B. D., L., S., N., A., O., & N. D., T. (2019). Study on the isomeric decay of neutron-rich isotope ⁶⁷Fe. Nuclear Science and Technology, 9(3), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.53747/jnst.v9i3.45

Study on the isomeric decay of neutron-rich isotope ⁶⁷Fe

L. X. Chung1, P.-A. Söderström2,3, A. Corsi4, P. Doornenbal2, A. Gillibert4, P. D. Khue1, B. D. Linh1, S. Nishimura2, A. Obertelli3,4, N. D. Ton1
1 Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology, P.O. Box 5T-160, Nghia Do, Hanoi, Vietnam
2 RIKEN Nishina Center, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
3 Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
4 Institute of Research into the Fundamental Laws of the Universe (IRFU), CEA Saclay, France

Main Article Content

Abstract

Gamma-delayed spectroscopy measurements of 67Fe have been performed at RIKEN,
Japan. The spectra from (p, 2p) and (p, pn) channels show a sharp peak at 367 keV. While the total isomer-yield spectrum presents clearly 2 peaks at 367 and 387 keV. The ratio of these two gammas’ intensity was determined to be equal to 0.126(3), in agreement with previous experiments. The origin of these two gammas could be from different isomers of 67Fe. The half-life (T1/2) of the isomer which decays to the 367 keV level was determined to be equal to 150(10) s, more than twice as long as from previous experiments.

Article Details

Keywords

SEASTAR, BigRIPS, ZeroDegree, EURICA, 67Fe, isomer

References

[1]. C. Santamaria et al., Physical Review Letters 115, 192501, 2015.
[2]. N. Paul et al., Physical Review Letters 118, 032501, 2017.
[3]. R. Taniuchi et al, Nature 569, 53, 2019.
[4]. L.X. Chung et al., Physical Review C 92, 034608, 2015.
[5]. S. Chen et al., Physical Review Letters 123, 142501, 2019.
[6]. A. Navin et al., Physical Review Letters 85, 266, 1999.
[7]. J. M. Daugas et al., Physics Letters B 476, 213, 2000.
[8]. R. Grzywacz et al., Physics Letters B 355, 437, 1995.
[9]. R. Grzywacz et al., Physical Review Letters 81, 766, 1998.
[10]. M. Sawicka et al., European Physical Journal A 16, 51, 2003.
[11]. J.M. Daugas et al., Physical Review C 83, 054312, 2011.
[12]. Phong V. H. et al., Physical Review C 100, 011302(R), 2019.
[13]. D. Pauwels et al., Physical Review C 79, 044309, 2009.
[14]. P. Doornenbal and A. Obertelli, RIBF NP-PAC-13, 2013.
[15]. N. Fukuda et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 317, 323, 2013.
[16]. A. Obertelli et al, The European Physical Journal A 50, 8, 2014.
[17]. S. Takeuchi et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 763, 596, 2014.
[18]. B. D. Linh et al., Nuclear Science and Technology 7, 08-15, 2017.
[19]. N. D. Ton et al., Nuclear Science and Technology 8, 04, 2018.
[20]. P.-A. Söderström et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 317, 649, 2013.
[21]. P.-A. Söderström et al., RIKEN Accelerator Progress Report 51, 2018.