Investigation of CTF void fraction prediction by ENTEK BM experiment data
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recently, CTF, a version of COBRA-TF code is reviewed to validate its simulation models by several experiments such as Castellana 4x4 rod bundle, EPRI 5x5 bundle tests, PSBT bundle tests and TPTF experiment. These above experiments provide enthalpy, mass flux (Castellana), temperature (EPRI) and void fraction (PSBT, TPTF) at exit channel only. In order to simulate PWR rod bundle flow behavior, it is necessary to review CTF with more experiment in high pressure condition and it is found that the ENTEK BM facility is suitable for this purpose. The ENTEK BM facility is used to simulate Russia RBMK and VVER rod bundle two phase flow with pressure at 3 and 7 MPa and it gives measured void fraction distribution along the channel. This study focus on two points: (a) accuracy assessment between CTF’s void fraction distribution predictions versus experiment void fraction distributions and (b) investigation of void fraction prediction uncertainty from propagation of input deviations caused by measured accuracy.
Article Details
References
[2] J. Michael Doster, “Assessment of the Performance of COBRA-TF for the Prediction of Subcooled Boiling Conditions in Rod Bundles”, CASL-8-2013-0201-000, September 30, 2013.
[3] M. Avramova, A. Velazquez-Lozada, and A. Rubin., “Comparative Analysis of CTF and Trace Thermal-Hydraulic Codes Using OECD/NRC PSBT Benchmark Void Distribution Database”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, Volume 2013, Article ID 725687, pp. 2-5, Accepted 16 November 2012.
[4] Murray Cameron Thames., “Application and Assessment of a 9-equation Sub channel Methodology to Rod Bundles”, A thesis in Nuclear Engineering for the Degree of Master of Science, North Carolina State University, pp. 44, 55, 2014.
[5] Robert K. Salko., “Improvement of COBRA-TF for modeling of PWR cold- and hot-legs during reactor transients”, A dissertation in Nuclear Engineering for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The Pennsylvania State University, pp. 7-17, May 2012.
[6] P. L. Garner., “RELAP5/MOD3.2 Analysis of INSC Standard Problem INSCSP-R7: Void Fraction Distribution over RBMK Fuel Channel Height for Experiments Performed in the ENTEK BM Test Facility”, United States International Nuclear Safety Center, Reactor Analysis and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, pp. 6-9, April 2002.
[7] S. G. Beus, “A two-phase turbulent mixing model for flow in rod bundles,” Tech. Rep. WAPD-T-2438, Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory, 1970.