Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2023-01-13
Abstract Views: 236
Views PDF: 95
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53747/nst.v12i1.336
Issue
Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Le, H. M., Le, Q. V., Tran, T. T., & Chau, V. T. (2023). Evaluating coincidence summing factor using marinelli beaker on coaxial HPGe detector by Monte Carlo simulation and calculating. Nuclear Science and Technology, 12(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.53747/nst.v12i1.336

Evaluating coincidence summing factor using marinelli beaker on coaxial HPGe detector by Monte Carlo simulation and calculating

Le Hoang Minh1,2, Le Quang Vuong1,2, Tran Thien Thanh1,2, Chau Van Tao1,2
1 Department of Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2 Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

This investigation aims to compare the full energy peak efficiencies in the energy range of 46-1836 keV on a type-p coaxial HPGe and estimate the coincidence summing factor for the case of Marinelli Beaker samples used by two general Monte-Carlo simulation software MCNP and PENELOPE. The radioactive nuclides used in determining the coincidence summing factor include 22Na, 60Co, 88Y, 133Ba, 134Cs, 154Eu, and 208Tl, which are prepared in HCl 2M solution and contained in a Marinelli beaker with the source’s volume of 3000 ml. The results demonstrate there is a good agreement between the two simulation software with an average discrepancy of 1.3%. On the other hand, the simulation coincidence summing factor values are also compared with the results from the calculating software ETNA with an average discrepancy of approximately 3.1%.

Article Details

Keywords

Coaxial HPGe detector, coincidence summing factor, Monte Carlo simulation

References

[1]. K. Debertin and U. Schötzig, “Coincidence summing corrections in Ge(Li)-spectrometry at low source-to-detector distances,” Nucl. Instruments Methods, vol. 158, no. C, 1979, doi: 10.1016/S0029-554X(79)94845-6.
[2]. M. C. Lépy, L. Ferreux, and S. Pierre, “Coincidence summing corrections applied to volume sources,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 70, no. 9, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.057.
[3]. A. N. Berlizov, “MCNP-CP: A correlated particle radiation source extension of a general purpose Monte Carlo N-particle transport code,” in ACS Symposium Series, 2007, vol. 945, doi: 10.1021/bk-2007-0945.ch013.
[4]. E. García-Toraño, V. Peyres, and F. Salvat, “PENNUC: Monte Carlo simulation of the decay of radionuclides,” Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 245, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.08.002.
[5]. C. J. Werner et al., “MCNP User’s Manual Code Version 6.2,” Los Alamos Natl. Lab., 2017.
[6]. E. García-Toraño, V. Peyres, M. M. Bé, C. Dulieu, M. C. Lépy, and F. Salvat, “Simulation of decay processes and radiation transport times in radioactivity measurements,” Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. with Mater. Atoms, vol. 396, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.02.002.
[7]. F. Salvat and M. Fern, “PENELOPE – A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport,” Nucl. Energy Agency, no. July, 2015.
[8]. T. T. Thanh et al., “A prototype of radioactive waste drum monitor by non-destructive assays using gamma spectrometry,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 109, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.11.037.
[9]. F. P. Marie-Christine Lépy, Marie-Martine Bé, “ETNA ( Efficiency Transfer for Nuclide Activity measurements ) Software for efficiency transfer and coincidence summing corrections in gamma-ray spectrometry,” no. February. p. Note Technique LNHB/01/09/A, 2004.
[10]. T. T. Thanh, L. Q. Vuong, P. L. Ho, H. D. Chuong, V. H. Nguyen, and C. V. Tao, “Validation of an advanced analytical procedure applied to the measurement of environmental radioactivity,” J. Environ. Radioact., vol. 184–185, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.12.020.