Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2022-05-11
Abstract Views: 173
Views PDF: 77
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53747/nst.v11i2.358
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Hoang, V. K. ., Tran, V. P. ., & Nguyen, T. D. . (2022). Neutronic design of a PWR fuel assembly with accident tolerant-composite for the long-life core. Nuclear Science and Technology, 11(2), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.53747/nst.v11i2.358

Neutronic design of a PWR fuel assembly with accident tolerant-composite for the long-life core

Hoang Van Khanh1, Viet Phu Tran2, Thi Dung Nguyen2
1 Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology (INST), Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute (VINATOM
2 Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology (INST), Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute (VINATOM)

Main Article Content

Abstract

For the future of nuclear power, the design and development of an economical, accident tolerant fuel (ATF) for use in the current pressurized water reactors (PWRs) are highly desirable and essential. It is reported that the composite fuels are advantageous over the conventional UO2 fuel due to their higher thermal conductivities and higher uranium densities. Due to higher uranium densities of the composite fuels, the use of composite fuels would lead to the significant increase of discharged burnup, thereby enhancing fuel cycle economy compared to that of the UO2 fuel. The higher thermal conductivities of composite fuels will increase the fuel safety margins. For implementation of the accident tolerant fuel concept, this study also investigates on the replacement of the conventional Zircaloy-4 cladding with SiC to minimize the hydrogen production due to interaction of water with cladding at high temperatures. In the present work, neutronic investigation of the composite fuels for a PWR has been conducted in comparison with that of the conventional UO2 fuel. Numerical calculations have been performed based on a lattice model using the SRAC2006 system code and JENDL-4.0 data library. Various parameters have been surveyed for designing a fuel with the UO2 and composite fuels such as U-235 enrichment, fuel pin pitch. In order to reduce the excess reactivity, Erbium was selected as a burnable poison due to its good depletion performance. The temperature coefficients including fuel, coolant temperature reactivity coefficients, and both the small and large void reactivity coefficients are also investigated. It was found that it is possible to achieve sufficient criticality up to 100 GWd/t burnups without compromising the safety parameters including that four reactivity coefficients are considered those associated with the fuel temperature, coolant temperature, small (5%) void and large (90%) void. Further analysis of the performance of the UO2 and composite fuels in a full core model of a PWR is being conducted.

Article Details

Keywords

UO₂ fuel, composite fuels, PWR assembly, neutronic analysis

References

[1]. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2004. Status of advanced light water reactor designs. IAEA-TECDOC-1391, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
[2]. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2007. Status of small reactor designs without on-site refueling. IAEA-TECDOC-1536, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
[3]. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2004. Innovative small and medium sized reactors: design features, safety approaches and R&D trends. IAEA-TECDOC-1451, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
[4]. Nuclear Energy Agency Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development(OECD), 2016. Small modular reactors: nuclear energy market potential for near-term deployment. NEA No. 7213, Nuclear Energy Agency Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development.
[5]. Luis H. Ortega, Brandon J. Blamer, Jordan A. Evans, et al., 2016. Development of an accident-tolerant fuel composite from uranium mononitride (UN) and uranium sesquisilicide (U3Si2) with increased uranium loading. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 471, 116 – 121.
[6]. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2006. Thermophysical Properties Database of Materials for Light Water Reactors and Heavy Water Reactors. IAEA-TECDOC-1496, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
[7]. Lahoda E.J., Hallstadius L., Boylan F., et al., 2014. What should be the objective of accident tolerant fuel?. Transactions-American Nuclear Society, 110, 733-736.
[8]. Xu W., Kozlowski T., Hales J.D., 2015. Neutronics and fuel performance evaluation of accident tolerant FeCrAl cladding under normal operation conditions. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 85, 763–775.
[9]. Carmack J., Goldner F., 2014. Forward for special JNM issue on accident tolerant fuels for LWRs. J. Nucl. Mater, 448 (1–3), 373.
[10]. Ott L.J., Robb K., Wang D., 2014. Preliminary assessment of accident-tolerant fuels on LWR performance during normal operation and under DB and BDB accident condition", J. Nucl. Mater, 448 (1), 520–533.
[11]. Zinkle S.J., Terrani K.A., Gehin J., et al., 2014. Accident tolerant fuels for LWRs: a perspective. J. Nucl. Mater, 448 (1), 374–379.
[12]. K. Yueh, D. Carpenter, H. Feinroth, 2010. Clad in clay. Nucl. Eng. Int, 55, 75–87.
[13]. Nathan Michael George, Kurt Terrani, Jeff Powers, et al., 2015. Neutronic analysis of candidate accident-tolerant cladding concepts in pressurized water reactors. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 75, 703–712.
[14]. Brian J.Jaques, Jennifer Watkins, Joseph R.Croteau, et al., 2015. Synthesis and sintering of UN-UO2 fuel composites. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 466, 745–754.
[15]. M. Uno, T. Nishi, M. Takano, 2012. Thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of the actinide nitrides. Comprehensive nuclear materials, Elsevier.
[16]. J.H. Yang, D.J. Kim, K.S. Kim, et al., 2015. UO2-UN composites with enhanced uranium density and thermal conductivity. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 465, 509-515.
[17]. Balyygin A., Davydova G., Fedosov A., et al., 1997. Use of uranium-erbium fuel in RBMK reactors, in safety issues associated with plutonium involvement in nuclear fuel cycle. Disarmament Technologies, 23, 121–130.
[18]. Dehaudt Ph., Mocellin A. et al., 1999. Advanced fuels for high burn up in small and medium reactors. International Conference on Future Nuclear Systems GLOBAL’99.
[19]. Vladimir Barchevtsev, Hisashi Ninokata, Vladimir Artisyuk, 2002. Potential to approach the long-life core in a light water reactor with uranium oxide fuel. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 5, 29, 595–608.
[20]. Syed Bahauddin Alam, Dinesh Kumar, Bader Almutairi, et al., May 2019. Small modular reactor core design for civil marine propulsion using micro-heterogeneous duplex fuel. Part I: Assembly-level analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Design, Volume 346, 157-175.
[21]. Syed Bahauddin Alam, DineshKumar, Bader Almutairi, et al., May 2019. Small modular reactor core design for civil marine propulsion using micro-heterogeneous duplex fuel Part II: whole-core analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Design, Volume 346, 176-191.
[22]. Nikitin K., Saito M., Artisyuk V., et al., 1999. An approach to long-life PWR core with advanced U–Np–Pu fuel. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 26 (11), 1021–1029.
[23]. Okumura K., 2007. COREBN: a Core Burnup Calculation Module for SRAC2006. JAEA-Data/Code 2007-003, Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
[24]. Shibata K., Iwamoto O., Nakagawa T., et al., 2011. JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J. Nucl. Sci, Technol., 48 (1), 1–30.
[25]. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), United States, 2011. Westinghouse AP1000 Design Control Document. Rev. 19, Accession number: ML11171A445, Date Released: Tuesday, June 21.
[26]. Hangbok Choi, Robert W. Schleicher, 2017. The Energy Multiplier Module (EM2) Status of Conceptual Design. Nuclear Technology, Volume 200, Issue 2.