Developing methodology to evaluate eye lens dose for medical staff

Tran Yen Nhi1, Nhu Tuyen Pham1, Thanh Luong Dang1
1 Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University (NTTU)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Due to epidemiological evidence on the increasing incidence of cataracts in interventional doctors, The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended decreasing the eye lens dose limit from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. Thus, The current status of dose assessment for healthcare workers shows that it requires more precise measurements of eye lens dose. we have researched Investigating dosimetric characteristics of OSLD nanoDot and Inlight type, using a multi–filter technique to determine the average air kerma of the incident beam and other essential dosimetric factors such as the relative energy responses and conversion coefficients from the air kerma to personal dose equivalent operational quantities Hp(d). Based on it developed the methodologies to evaluate eye lens dose for medical staff, especially high-risk subjects such as interventional doctors. Results show that 3 methods to evaluate eye lens dose have been deployed in the cardiovascular intervention department: directly by nanoDot dosimeter, indirectly by personal dosimeter (Inlight), and quick method based on the relationship with exposure duration. In one case, the doctor exceeded the threshold dose of 20 mSv/year without protective measures. Besides that, the risk of cataracts is possible when considering the cumulative dose for 30 years of work.

Article Details

References

[1]. UNSCEAR, Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation, 2020/2021 report to the general assembly with scientific annex A: Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation, 2022, New York: United Nations.
[2]. Ariel Roguin et al. (2013), “Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures”, The American Journal of Cardiology, 111 (9), DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.2060.
[3]. Kaatsch HL et al., “Radiation exposure during angiographic interventions in interventional radiology - risk and the fate of advanced procedures”, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 98(5):865-872, 2022 Jan. 4, DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2020362.
[4]. Picano, E., Vano, E., “The Radiation Issue in Cardiology: the time for action is now”, Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 35, 2011 Nov. 21, DOI:10.1186/1476-7120-9-35.
[5]. ICRP Publication 60, The 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
[6]. IAEA, Radiation protection of medical staff from cataract. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/radiology/cataract/staff
[7]. Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics, Eye lens dosimetry: Recommendations, No. 17, 2021 Sep.
[8]. Stahl CM, Meisinger QC, Andre MP, Kinney TB, Newton IG., “Radiation Risk to the Fluoroscopy Operator and Staff”, American Journal of Roentgenology. 207(4):737-744, 2016 Oct., DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16555.
[9]. Lloyd W. Klein MD., “SCAI multi-society position statement on occupational health hazards of the cath lab: Shifting the paradigm for healthcare workers’ protection”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 75:1718-1724, 2020 Feb. 11, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28579.
[10]. Krisanachinda A, Srimahachota S, Matsubara K., “The current status of eye lens dose measurement in interventional cardiology personnel in Thailand”, Radiology Physics and Technology, 10(2):142-147, 2017 May. 27, DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0403-8.
[11]. Yoshihiro Haga et al., “Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures”, Scientific reports, 7:569, 2017 Apr. 03, DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-00556-3.
[12]. Laudauer Ltd. (2018), InLight OSL Dosimeter System - User Manual.
[13]. Nguyen Thi Mai Loan et al. “Research and development of the algorithms to determine the operational personal equivalence doses using a photoluminescent dosimeter”, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Report at Conference on Nuclear Science and Technology, 2023 Aug.
[14]. ISO 4037–3:2019, Radiological protection - X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosemeters and dose rate meters and for determining their response as a function of photon energy - Part 3: Calibration of area and personal dosemeters and the measurement of their response as a function of energy and angle of incidence, 2019.
IAEA, Investigation of Uncertainty Sources in the External Dosimetry Laboratory. [Online]. Available: http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/rw/ppss/quality-management/uncertainty-tld-system.pdf