Developing methodology to evaluate eye lens dose for medical staff: preliminary results
Main Article Content
Abstract
Due to epidemiological evidence on the increasing incidence of cataracts in interventional cardiologists, the ICRP has recommended reducing the eye lens dose limit from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. Thus, the current status of occupational dose assessment for healthcare workers shows that it requires more precise measurements of eye lens dose. We investigated dosimetric characteristics of OSLD nanoDot and InLight type by using a multi–filter technique to determine the average air kerma of the incident beam and other essential dosimetric factors such as the relative energy responses and conversion coefficients from the air kerma to personal dose equivalent operational quantities Hp(d). Based on assessing and analyzing factors that influence Hp(d), the methodologies were developed to evaluate eye lens dose for medical staff, especially high-risk subjects such as interventional physicians. The results show that 3 methods to evaluate eye lens dose have been deployed in the cardiovascular intervention department: directly by nanoDot dosimeter, indirectly by personal dosimeter (InLight), and quick method based on the relationship with exposure duration. It was found that one interventional cardiologist exceeded the dose limit of 20 mSv/year for eye lens dose without protective measures. In other words, the risk of cataracts is possible when the cumulative dose for 30 working years is considered
Article Details
Keywords
OSLD, eye lens dose, personal dose equivalent quantities Hp(d)
References
[2]. Ariel Roguin et al. (2013), “Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures”, The American Journal of Cardiology, 111 (9), DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.2060.
[3]. Kaatsch HL et al., “Radiation exposure during angiographic interventions in interventional radiology - risk and the fate of advanced procedures”, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 98(5):865-872, 2022 Jan. 4, DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2020362.
[4]. Picano, E., Vano, E., “The Radiation Issue in Cardiology: the time for action is now”, Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 35, 2011 Nov. 21, DOI:10.1186/1476-7120-9-35.
[5]. ICRP Publication 60, The 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
[6]. IAEA, Radiation protection of medical staff from cataract. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/radiology/cataract/staff
[7]. Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics, Eye lens dosimetry: Recommendations, No. 17, 2021 Sep.
[8]. Stahl CM, Meisinger QC, Andre MP, Kinney TB, Newton IG., “Radiation Risk to the Fluoroscopy Operator and Staff”, American Journal of Roentgenology. 207(4):737-744, 2016 Oct., DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16555.
[9]. Lloyd W. Klein MD., “SCAI multi-society position statement on occupational health hazards of the cath lab: Shifting the paradigm for healthcare workers’ protection”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 75:1718-1724, 2020 Feb. 11, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28579.
[10]. Krisanachinda A, Srimahachota S, Matsubara K., “The current status of eye lens dose measurement in interventional cardiology personnel in Thailand”, Radiology Physics and Technology, 10(2):142-147, 2017 May. 27, DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0403-8.
[11]. Yoshihiro Haga et al., “Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures”, Scientific reports, 7:569, 2017 Apr. 03, DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-00556-3.
[12]. Laudauer Ltd. (2018), InLight OSL Dosimeter System - User Manual.
[13]. Nguyen Thi Mai Loan et al. “Research and development of the algorithms to determine the operational personal equivalence doses using a photoluminescent dosimeter”, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Report at Conference on Nuclear Science and Technology, 2023 Aug.
[14]. ISO 4037–3:2019, Radiological protection - X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosemeters and dose rate meters and for determining their response as a function of photon energy - Part 3: Calibration of area and personal dosemeters and the measurement of their response as a function of energy and angle of incidence, 2019.
IAEA, Investigation of Uncertainty Sources in the External Dosimetry Laboratory. [Online]. Available: http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/rw/ppss/quality-management/uncertainty-tld-system.pdf