Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2019-06-15
Abstract Views: 108
Views PDF: 39
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53747/jnst.v9i2.48
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Lüley, J., Vrban, B., Čerba, . Štefan, Osuský, F., & Nečas, V. (2019). Processing of the multigroup cross-sections for MCNP calculations. Nuclear Science and Technology, 9(2), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.53747/jnst.v9i2.48

Processing of the multigroup cross-sections for MCNP calculations

Jakub Lüley1,2, Branislav Vrban1, Štefan Čerba1, Filip Osuský1, Vladimír Nečas1
1 Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Institute of Nuclear and Physical Engineering, Ilkovičova 3, 812 19 Bratislava, Slovakia
2 B&J NUCLEAR Ltd., Alžbetin Dvor 145, 900 42 Miloslavov, Slovakia

Main Article Content

Abstract

Stochastic Monte Carlo (MC) neutron transport codes are widely used in various reactor
physics applications, traditionally related to criticality safety analyses, radiation shielding and validation of deterministic transport codes. The main advantage of Monte Carlo codes lies in their ability to model complex and detail geometries without the need of simplifications. Currently, one of the most accurate and developed stochastic MC code for particle transport simulation is MCNP. To achieve the best real world approximations, continuous-energy (CE) cross-section (XS) libraries are often used. These CE libraries consider the rapid changes of XS in the resonance energy range; however, computing-intensive simulations must be performed to utilize this feature. To broaden our
computation abilities for industrial application and partially to allow the comparison with
deterministic codes, the CE cross section library of the MCNP code is replaced by the multigroup (MG) cross-section data. This paper is devoted to the cross-section processing scheme involving modified versions of TRANSX and CRSRD codes. Following this approach, the same data may be used in deterministic and stochastic codes. Moreover, using formerly developed and upgraded crosssection processing scheme, new MG libraries may be tailored to the user specific applications. For demonstration of the proposed cross-section processing scheme, the VVER-440 benchmark devoted to fuel assembly and pip-by-pin power distribution was selected. The obtained results are compared with continues energy MCNP calculation and multigroup KENO-VI calculation.

Article Details

Keywords

MCNP, Multigroup calculation, VVER, criticality

References

[1]. B. C. Kriedrowski, F. B. Brown, “Applications of Adjoint-Based Techniques in Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo Criticality Calculations”. Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo 2013, Paris, France, 2013.
[2]. C.J. Werner(editor), “MCNP User’s Manual - Code Version 6.2”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, report LA-UR-17-29981, 2017.
[3]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, “SCALE Code System: Version 6.2.2.”, ORNL/TM-2005/39, p. 2747, 2017.
[4]. J. C. Wagner, E. L. Redmont II, S. P. Palmtag, J. S. Hendricks, “MCNP: Multigroup/Adjoin Capabilities”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1994.
[5]. Š. Čerba, B. Vrban, J. Lüley, F. Osuský, V. Nečas, “Development of Multi-Group XS Library for VVER-440”, Proc Int. Conf. Nuclear Energy for New Europe, Portorož, Slovenia, 2018.
[6]. M. B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Obložinský, et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data” in Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. (112), pp. 2887-2996, 2011.
[7]. Š. Čerba, J. I. M. Damian, J. Lüley, B. Vrban, V. Nečas, “Comparison of thermal scattering processing options for S(aplha,beta) cards in MCNP”, Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 55, pp. 18-22, 2013.
[8]. J. Keinert, M. Mattes, E. Sartori, “JEF-1 scattering law data”, JEF Report 2/JEF/DOC 41.2. Tec. Rep., IKE Stuttgart, 1984.
[9]. J. I. Márquez Damián, J. R. Granada, D. C. Malaspina, “CAB models for water: A new evaluation of the thermal neutron scattering laws for light and heavy water in ENDF-6 format”, Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 65, pp. 280-289, 2014.
[10]. SCALE: A Comprehensive Modeling and Simulation Suite for Nuclear Safety Analysis and Design, ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.1.3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 2011.
[11]. R.E. MacFarlane, “TRANSX 2.15: A Code for Interfacing MATXS Cross-Section Libraries to Nuclear Transport Codes for Fusion Systems Analysis”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 1992.
[12]. R. E. Alcouffe et al., “PARTISN: A Time-Dependent, Parallel Neutral Particle Transport Code System,” LA-UR-08-07258, 2008.
[13]. K. L. Derstine: DIF3D 10.0, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 2011.
[14]. B. Vrban, Š. Čerba, J. Lüley, F. Osuský, V. Nečas, J. Haščík, Proc Int. Conf. Nuclear Energy for New Europe, Portorož, Slovenia, 2018.
[15]. V. Krýsl, P. Mikoláš, D. Sprinzl and J. Švarný “‘Full-Core’ VVER-440 benchmark extension”, Proc. of the 24th Symposium of AER, Sochi, Russia, 2014.
[16]. J. Lüley, B. Vrban, Š. Čerba, F. Osuský, V. Nečas, J. Haščík, “Assembly homogenization technique for VVER-440 reactor multi-group calculations” ", Proc Int. Conf. Nuclear Energy for New Europe, Portorož, Slovenia, 2018.
[17]. LANL, „MCNP - A General N - Particle Transport Code“, Los Alamos National Laboratoy, Los Alamos, 2003.