Uncertainty quantification of RELAP5/MOD3.3 for interfacial shear stress during small break LOCA

DUONG Thanh Tung1, NGUYEN Hoang Anh1, Richard TREWIN2, Hiroshige KIKURA3
1 Vietnam Agency for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, 113, Tran Duy Hung Street, Cau Giay Dist., Hanoi
2 Group of Safety Analaysis, AREVA GmbH, Paul-Gossen Street 100, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
3 Res. Lab. for Nuclear Reactors,Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-N1-7 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) is applied as Deterministic Approach for safety analysis of Nuclear Power Plant using the system analysis code. The system analysis code such as Relap5/Mod3.3 is required to be able to simulate the thermal-hydraulic behavior of nuclear reactor in some accident scenarios. Relap5/Mod3.3 is developed based on two-fluid models and 6 conservation equations for each phase which challenge for mathematical modeling such as onedemensional equation, time-dependent equation, multidimensional effects or complicated geometry. Thus, it is necessary to verify the applicability of a system analysis code that is able to predict accurately the two-phase flow such as interfacial shear stress between two phases: liquid and gases. It is also important to know the prediction uncertainty by using computer code due to the constitutive relation in the two-fluid model equation. In PWR’s Small-Break LOCA (SB-LOCA) accident, the loop-seal clearing is important phenomena where we would like to know how much water (reflux condensation) will be come into the reactor core from Steam Generator. In this work, the UPTFTRAM simulated the counter-current flow in Loop-seal Clearing between vapor and liquid in Loopseal during SB-LOCA is used to verify the applicability of Relap5/Mod3.3 and the experimental data are used to compare with simulation results. Moreover, the uncertainty evaluation or estimation is also investigated by applying the statistical method or BEPU in which the SUSA program developed by GRS is used.

Article Details

References

[1]. Francesco D'auria, Anis Bousbia-Salah, Alessandro Petruzzi and Alessandro del Nevo . “State Of The Art In Using Best Estimate Calculation Tools In Nuclear Technology”, Nuclear engineering and technology, vol.38 no.1,2006.
[2]. Katsma, D. K. R., Hall, G., Shaw R. A., Fletcher, C. D., Boodry k. S., “Quantifying Reactor Safety Margins. NUREG/CR-5249”, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1989.
[3]. P.A. Weiss and R.J. Hertlein, “UPTF Test Results: First Three Separate Effect Tests”, Nuclear Engineering and Design Vol. 108, pp. 249-263, 1988.
[4]. J. Liebert, R. Emmerling, “UPTF experiment Flow phenomena during full-scale loop seal clearing of a PWR”, Nuclear Engineering and Design 179 (1998), pp. 51–64.
[5]. Richard R. Trewin, “One-dimensional three-field model of condensation in horizontal countercurrent flow with supercritical liquid velocity”, Nuclear Engineering and Design vol. 241,pp. 2470–2483, 2011.
[6]. RELAP5/MOD3.3. Code Manual Volume I: Codes Structure, System Models, and Solution Methods; code manual Volume II: APPENDIX A INPUT REQUIREMENTS, 2016.