Neutronic analysis of fuel pin design for the long-life core in a pressurized water reactor
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work presents the neutronic analysis of fuel design for a long-life core in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). In order to achieve a high burnup, a high enrichment U-235 is traditionally considered without special constraints against proliferation. To counter the excess reactivity, Erbium was selected as a burnable poison due to its good depletion performance. Calculations based on a standard fuel model were carried out for the PWR type core using SRAC code system. A parametric study was performed to quantify the neutronically achievable burnup at a number of enrichment levels and for a numerous geometries covering a wide design space of lattice pitch. The fuel temperature and coolant temperature reactivity coefficients as well as the small and large void reactivity coefficients are also investigated. It was found that it is possible to achieve sufficient criticality up to 100 GWd/tHM burnup without compromising the safety parameters.
Article Details
Keywords
PWR fuel pin design, long-life core, neutronic analysis
References
[2]. IAEA, “Status of Small Reactor Designs Without On-Site Refueling”, IAEA-TECDOC-1536, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2007.
[3]. IAEA, “Innovative Small And Medium Sized Reactors: Design Features, Safety Approaches And R&D Trends”, IAEA-TECDOC-1451, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2004.
[4]. OECD, “Small Modular Reactors: Nuclear Energy Market Potential for Near-term Deployment”, NEA No. 7213, Nuclear Energy Agency Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, 2016.
[5]. Nikitin K., Saito M., Artisyuk V., Apse V., Chmelev A., “An approach to long-life PWR core with advanced U–Np–Pu fuel”, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 26 (11), 1021–1029, 1999.
[6]. Balyygin A., Davydova G., Fedosov A., et al., “Use of uranium-erbium fuel in RBMK reactors, in safety issues associated with plutonium involvement in nuclear fuel cycle”, Disarmament Technologies, 23, 121–130, 1997.
[7]. Dehaudt, Ph., Mocellin, A. et al., “Advanced fuels for high burn up in small and medium reactors”, International Conference on Future Nuclear Systems GLOBAL’99, 1999.
[8]. Vladimir Barchevtsev, Hisashi Ninokata, Vladimir Artisyuk, “Potential to approach the long-life core in a light water reactor with uranium oxide fuel”, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 29, 595–608, 2002.
[9]. Syed Bahauddin Alam, et al., “Small modular reactor core design for civil marine propulsion using micro-heterogeneous duplex fuel”, Part I: Assembly-level analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Design, Volume 346, 157-175, May 2019.
[10]. Syed Bahauddin Alam, et al., “Small modular reactor core design for civil marine propulsion using micro-heterogeneous duplex fuel”, Part II: whole-core analysis, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Volume 346, 176-191, May 2019.
[11]. Zinkle S.J., Terrani K.A., Gehin J.C., Ott L.J., Snead L.L., “Accident tolerant fuels for LWRs: A perspective”, J. Nucl. Mater, 448, 374–379, 2014.
[12]. Nathan Michael George, “Neutronic analysis of candidate accident-tolerant cladding concepts in pressurized water reactors”, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 75, 703–712, 2015.
[13]. Okumura, K., “COREBN: a Core Burnup Calculation Module for SRAC2006”, JAEA-Data/Code 2007-003, JapanAtomic Energy Agency, 2007.
[14]. Shibata K., Iwamoto O., Nakagawa T., Iwamoto N., Ichihara A., Kunieda S., Chiba S., Furutaka K., Otuka N., Ohsawa T., Murata T., Matsunobu H., Zukeran A., Kamada S., Katakura J., “JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering”, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol, 48 (1), 1–30, 2011.
[15]. Hangbok Choi, Robert W. Schleicher, “The Energy Multiplier Module (EM2) Status of Conceptual Design”, Nuclear Technology, Volume 200, Issue 2, 2017.